|
107 Stories About Chemistry
|
Now, were we not too hasty in concluding that in undertaking to explain the structure of the Periodic Table the physicists found no defects in its construction? It would be a good thing if a definite electron shell were filled regularly in the inhabitants of each floor of the Big House, and if each floor started with an alkali metal and ended in an inert gas The capacity of each period would then be equal to the capacity of the electron shell. Alas, we are obliged to speak of this in the subjunctive
mood: if this, if that. Actually the balance does not tally. The third
period of Mendeleyev's Table accommodates less inhabitants than there are
electrons in the third shell, the M-shell. And so on.
In calcium, potassium's next-door neighbour, the newest electron also finds it "more advantageous" to occupy the outermost shell, because then the energy supply of the calcium atom is smaller than with any other electron distribution. But in scandium, which follows calcium, the tendency to continue filling the outer shell of the atom vanishes. Its new electron "dives" into the incomplete second-last M-shell. And since this shell has ten vacancies (we already know that the maximum capacity of the M -shell is 18 electrons), the atoms of the next ten elements, from scandium to zinc, gradually fill up their M-shells. Finally, in zinc, all the electrons of the M-shell are in place. After this the N-shell again begins to accept electrons. As soon as it contains a total of 8 electrons we get the inert gas krypton. In rubidium the old story repeats itself: the fifth shell appears before the fourth is complete.
|
