Creationist Quotes (9)
As Karl Marx once noted: 'Hegel remarks somewhere that all great, world-historical facts and personages occur, as it were, twice. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce.' William Jennings Bryan and the Scopes trial was a tragedy. The creationists and intelligent design theorists are a farce.
'75 Years and Still No Peace'. Humanist (Sep 2000)
See also: | Bryan_William (2) | Fact (146) | Farce (2) | History (69) | Intelligent Design (3) | Karl Marx (9) | Scopes_John (3) | Tragedy (2) | Trial (6)
Creationists have also changed their name ... to intelligent design theorists who study 'irreducible complexity' and the 'abrupt appearance' of life—yet more jargon for 'God did it.' ... Notice that they have no interest in replacing evolution with native American creation myths or including the Code of Hammarabi alongside the posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools.
'75 Years and Still No Peace'. Humanist (Sep 2000)
See also: | Complexity (22) | Evolution (237) | God (131) | Intelligent Design (3) | Myth (15) | School (18) | Science And Religion (76)
Five per cent vision is better than no vision at all. Five per cent hearing is better than no hearing at all. Five per cent flight efficiency is better than no flight at all. It is thoroughly believable that every organ or apparatus that we actually see is the product of a smooth trajectory through animal space, a trajectory in which every intermediate stage assisted survival and reproduction.
[Rebutting the Creationist assertion that fully developed organs could not have arisen 'by chance.']
[Rebutting the Creationist assertion that fully developed organs could not have arisen 'by chance.']
The Blind Watchmaker (1986, 1996) 90-91.
See also: | Evolution (237) | Flight (14) | Hearing (3) | Organ (20) | Reproduction (28) | Survival (15) | Vision (4)
It is not equal time the creationists want. ... Don't kid yourself. They want all the time there is.
In The Roving Mind (1983), 18.
Science is complex and chilling. The mathematical language of science is understood by very few. The vistas it presents are scary—an enormous universe ruled by chance and impersonal rules, empty and uncaring, ungraspable and vertiginous. How comfortable to turn instead to a small world, only a few thousand years old, and under God's personal; and immediate care; a world in which you are His peculiar concern.
The 'Threat' of Creationism. In Ashley Montagu (ed.), Science and Creationism (1984), 192.
See also: | Age Of The Earth (8) | Chance (40) | Comfort (6) | Complexity (22) | Fear (25) | God (131) | Mathematics (226) | Religion (69) | Science (463) | Universe (143)
Science is dangerous. There is no question but that poison gas, genetic engineering, and nuclear weapons and power stations are terrifying. It may be that civilization is falling apart and the world we know is coming to an end. In that case, why no turn to religion and look forward to the Day of Judgment, ... [being] lifted into eternal bliss ... [and] watching the scoffers and disbelievers writhe forever in torment.
The 'Threat' of Creationism. In Ashley Montagu (ed.), Science and Creationism (1984), 192.
See also: | Civilization (46) | Dangerous (8) | Fear (25) | Genetic Engineering (11) | Nuclear Power (3) | Poison (17) | Religion (69) | Science (463)
Science is uncertain. Theories are subject to revision; observations are open to a variety of interpretations, and scientists quarrel amongst themselves. This is disillusioning for those untrained in the scientific method, who thus turn to the rigid certainty of the Bible instead. There is something comfortable about a view that allows for no deviation and that spares you the painful necessity of having to think.
The 'Threat' of Creationism. In Ashley Montagu (ed.), Science and Creationism (1984), 192.
See also: | Bible (19) | Comfort (6) | Deviation (3) | Quarrel (2) | Religion (69) | Science (463) | Scientific Method (62) | Theory (192) | Thinking (58) | Uncertainty (11)
The scientist believes in proof without certainty, the bigot in certainty without proof.
Ashley Montagu (ed.), Science and Creationism (1984), Introduction, 9.
[Creationists] make it sound as though a 'theory' is something you dreamt up after being drunk all night.
Remark to the National Center Against Censorship (NCAC)(1980). In Norman A. Johnson, Darwinian Detectives (), 27.