The
Century Magazine:
October 1897
WHAT
IS AN AURORA?
by
Alexander
McAdie
 |
|
WEST
END OF AN
AURORAL BAND
Photographed
February 1, 1892, by Dr. Brendel, and sent by him to Mr. James P. Hall,
and by him given to the author
|
|
On the
first day of January, 1892, Dr.
Brendel and
Herr Raschen
reached the Alten Fiord, Lapland, to remain several months, studying
auroral displays and magnetic disturbances. Brendel succeeded in
photographing the aurora, a very difficult thing to do, as all who
have attempted it know. The deep reds which are so beautiful to the eye
make little impression on the photographer's plates, and the light
itself is generally feeble and flickering. Not unaptly have the
quivering auroral beams been called "merry dancers." Even the bright
displays are hard to photograph, as we may see from an entry in
General Greely's notebook on January 21, 1882. "A most beautiful
aurora," he says, "with intense light, at times sufficiently bright to
cast my shadow on
the snow. Rice exposed a sensitive plate without effect, but the
constantly changing position of the aurora may have been the cause."
But, some one will say, photographing an
aurora,
while interesting
from a scientific standpoint, is not a very momentous matter to men or
nations. And we make haste to answer that these auroral displays are
linked with phenomena which have a very practical interest. Long before
the now well-known relations of solar phenomena and terrestrial
magnetism had been determined, Sir William Herschel thought he could
from meager data detect evidence that the price of wheat was generally
higher at times of few sun-spots. In later days we have Stanley Jevons
tracing a connection between financial crises and sun-spots, and a
host of writers tabulating the allied phenomena - of auroras,
sun-spots, magnetic disturbances - and tracing in their periodicities
a close relation to famines, commercial crises, and abnormal weather.
What a wonderful achievement it would be to foresee the weal and woe of
a decade!
While such relations are conjectural,
there is
little doubt that
auroras and solar and magnetic disturbances are closely linked. They do
not come and go by chance. The astrophysicist knows that these
phenomena will be very numerous in 1903. He knows that a similar
condition will not again occur until 1915, the mean period being eleven
years. How was this period discovered? Professor Langley tells us in
his " New Astronomy," page 76:
|

PHOTOGRAPH
OF
SUN-SPOTS OF AUGUST 8, 1893. MADE AT LICK OBSERVATORY BY PROFESSOR C.D.
PERRINE.
|
It does not seem to
have occurred to anyone to see whether they
[sun-spots] had any regular period for coming or going, till Schwabe, a
magistrate in a little German town, who happened to have a small
telescope and a good deal of leisure, began for his own amusement to
note their number every day. He commenced in 1826, and with German
patience observed daily for forty years. He first found that the spots
grew more numerous in 1830, when there was no single day without one;
then the number declined very rapidly, till in1833 they were about
gone; then they increased in number again till 1838, then again
declined, and so on, till it became evident that sun-spots do not come
and go by chance, but run through a cycle of growth and disappearance,
on the average about once in every eleven years. While amusing himself
with his telescope, an important sequence in Nature had thus been added
to our knowledge by the obscure Hofrath Schwabe, who indeed compares
himself to Saul, going out to seek his father's asses and finding a
kingdom.
|

PHOTOGRAPH
OF
SUN-SPOTS OF AUGUST 29, 1893, SHOWING RELATIVE SIZE. MADE AT LICK
OBSERVATORY BY PROFESSOR C.D.
PERRINE.
For the purpose of illustration , the spots are made white.
|
Once the sun-spot period was clearly
established, it
was only
necessary to ransack chronological lists of auroras to find how
intimately auroras and sun-spots were connected. Three patient
investigators, Wolf, Fritz, and Loomis, soon proved that auroras were
most frequent when sun.spots were most numerous. The next step was to
find individual relations. One bright September morning thirty-seven
years ago, Carrington and Hodgson, separately studying the face of the
sun, saw a
remarkable outburst near the edge of a great spot. For some days the
magnetometers at Kew showed unusual perturbation, and for several
nights magnificent auroral displays were seen over two continents. It
was long thought that a violent magnetic disturbance occurred
simultaneously
with the
outburst, but recent examination of the records
disproves this. In 1872 Professor Young noticed a disturbance in the
chromosphere in the neighborhood of a sun-spot, and upon asking the
astronomers at Greenwich and Stonyhurst to examine their magnetic
records, it was found that great disturbances had occurred about that
time. Ten years later the astronomer at Greenwich sent out a message
that read something like this: "Remarkable sun-spot now
visible. . . . Area of whole spot, 247/100000
of the sun's visible
surface." Try to imagine what this means, and fancy yourself on the sun
while that tremendous storm was in progress. We know that here on earth
there was a magnetic storm with auroral displays
that beggar description. Beginning a little before daylight on
November 17, 1882, not a wire of the Western Union Telegraph Company
could be used for three hours. The market quotations could not be sent.
Late in the afternoon the trouble seemed to decrease, but at night
there was a brilliant auroral display, and all telegraphic service was
again interrupted. A very short circuit from Boston to Dedham showed
the disturbance equally with other circuits. The cables to Europe and
the wires to Chicago were alike unworkable. A message was sent from
Bangor to North Sidney, seven hundred miles, by cutting out the regular
batteries and allowing the energy of nature to have its own way. The
current was just as strong as if a hundred cells had been at work. At
Albany the switchboard was ignited; and in telephone offices generally
the annunciators dropped continually. Switchboards and wires were
burned at Chicago. Incandescent lamps were illuminated in St. Paul, and
even in far San Francisco the telephone operators were nigh
distracted. Over half of North America, across the Atlantic, and on
over northern Europe, it seemed as if legions of ethereal demons were
busy inciting electric and magnetic apparatus to strange and
mischievous antics.
It so happened that about the pole that
year were
clustered representatives from twelve nations. The Russian
international expeditions were at the Lena Delta and Nova Zembla; the
Norwegian at Bossekop; the Dutch at Dicksonhavn; the German at Kingua
Fiord; the Finnish at Sodankyla; the Swedish at Spitzbergen; the
Danish at Godthaab; the Austro-Hungarian at Jan Mayen; and the British
at Fort Rae. France had two stations in the antarctic region, and our
own country had the well-known Lady Franklin Bay party under Greely,
and the Point Barrow party under Ray.
 |
|
APPEARANCE
OF THE
AURORA BOREALIS IN THE EAST, AS SEEN AT CAPE THORDSEN, DECEMBER 21,
1892.
From
the report of
the Swedish expedition, "Aurora Boreales," by Carlheim-Gyllenskiold.
|
|
November 14-19, 1882, was a period never
to be
forgotten by these
arctic prisoners. While we at home saw the display of a decade, the
observers of the frozen North, turning their eyes southward or westward
or eastward, saw visions glorious by as well as by night, and
felt perhaps some measure of recompense for their isolation and peril.
Coming out of their dark quarters, they were startled and at first
blinded, and General Greely writes: "The curtain appeared at one time
so near our heads that Gardner and Israel speak of having unconsciously
dodged to avoid it." In Ralston's diary is the entry: "The
aurora appeared so low down that I raised my hand instinctively,
expecting to bathe it in the light"; and Brainard relates a like
impression. What a pity that under such conditions no electrometric
apparatus was available! With Thomson water-dropping collectors and
multiple-quadrant electrometers, records of the electrification of the
lower air could have been obtained, and a few more threads raveled out
from nature's tangled skein. Some observations of the potential of the
air, made by Andrée, who was a member of the Swedish party
at Cape Thordsen, Spitzhergen, seem to show that the electric potential
diminished very rapidly during an aurora, and in fact became negative.
As is well known, this same Andrée has lately attempted to
reach the pole in an air-ship. Not the least valuable result of the
adventure
will be the increase in our knowledge of the electricity of the air in
polar regions. We shall learn a little more about the height of
auroras. We know now that while they are from fifty to seventy miles
high in latitude 50°, the height decreases as we approach
68°.
At Godthaab, Paulsen measured many with theodolites, and found that
some were less than two fifths of a mile high. Hildebrandsson and
others have seen auroras below the clouds. Such results lead us to
believe that the time is ripe to suggest a new classification of
auroral displays. It has been further noticed that the colorless and
quiescent auroras were necessarily coincident with magnetic
disturbances, while those of brilliant color and rapid change were.
Many so-called auroras are probably what the Germans would call
and akin to silent lightning.
Our little planet unquestionably
responds to solar
disturbances. The intense auroral displays that occur simultaneously
over continents are,
one may think, answering signals to the messages flashed from the sun
through the quivering ether. But we may also have our own little storms
and disturbances; and while appearances may be similar, the phenomena
are of different origin. Some of the difficulties and discrepancies
which have been met in tabulating sun-spot, magnetic, and auroral
phenomena can be thus explained. One wise remark by Professor Young
should not pass unnoticed. "The solar tumult," he says, "may be the
brother, and not the father, of our aurora." But this much is plain:
the phenomena are closely allied, and mastery of the terrestrial
displays will enable us to reach out and attempt the conquest of the
solar ones.
It may be frankly said that the man of science feels that the aurora
has baffled his scrutiny. Unlike lightning, this mysterious light is
as harmless as it is beautiful. Weyprecht, who did so much to establish
the circumpolar stations,watching from the deck of his ice-bound
corvette, thus describes what he saw:
In the south a faint, scarcely visible band lies close to the horizon.
All at once it
rises and spreads rapidly east and west; . . . the waves of light drive
on violently; . . . the edges assume a deep red and green color, and
dance up and down; the rays shoot up more rapidly and become shorter;
all rise together and approach nearer and nearer the magnetic pole. It
looks as if there was a race, and each aspired to reach the pole first.
The whole sky is in flames. Involuntarily we listen; such a spectacle
must, we think, be accompanied with sound. But unbroken stillness
prevails. No pencil can draw it, no colors can paint it, no words
describe in all its magnificence the aurora of the coming storm.
 |
|
WEST
END OF AN
AURORAL BAND
Photographed
February 1, 1892, by Dr. Brendel, and sent by him to Mr. James P. Hall,
and by him given to the author
|
|
In
1881-2 Lemstrom covered a hillside at Oratunturi with uncovered
copper wire having at certain intervals discharging points. A powerful
electric current was sent through this, and the peak of the hill at
night, it was said, glowed with a pale-yellow or blue light. None of
the neighboring peaks were thus marked. This was an attempt
at artificial production of the aurora, and may in some respects be
fairly compared with Franklin's kite experiment with the lightning.
Experiments elsewhere, however, have failed to give similar results.
Tromholt, with similar apparatus and in high latitudes, and
Vausseuat at the Pic du Midi de Bigorre, where an area of six hundred
and
forty square meters was covered with wire having fourteen thousand
discharging points, obtained no artificial auroras.
One well-nigh forgotten experiment of
the Faraday of
America may he
recalled. Joseph Henry in 1872 concentrated by a small concave mirror
a beam of auroral light, and allowed it to fall upon a paper on which
were written some letters with sulphate of quinine, and these became
visible just as when illuminated by a discharge of electricity. He
also noticed the effect upon a galvanometer needle during an aurora,
observing that the needle was deflected, and that a like deflection
was always observed "when a flash of lightning took place within the
visible horizon of Washington."
Finally, what has that most powerful pry
of modern
science, the
spectroscope, revealed? It tells us what metals are flaming in distant
worlds; what can it tell us of the aurora? When the light emitted by an
incandescent gas is examined with a spectroscope, bright bands of
lines are seen, and these are so characteristic that they serve to
identify the substance. When the light passes through a gas, however,
certain rays are absorbed, depending upon the intervening gas; and in
the spectrum black
lines are
seen exactly where characteristic bright
lines would have been. The aurora gives a spectrum something like that
given by lightning, or rather like several lightning spectra
superposed. One bright line is always present, but as many as eleven
lines had been seen up to 1883. The Cape Thordsen observers ran the
number up to thirty-two. Sixteen of these lines nearly coincide with
air-lines, eight with the positive-pole spectrum of nitrogen, four with
the nitrogen negative pole, and three with hydrogen lines. From
spectroscopic evidence we should say that the aurora was a discharge
of electricity in rarefied air. Lockyer has built up a spectrum almost
identical with that of the aurora by taking low-temperature
spectra of manganese, magnesium, lead, and thallium. It is not the
auroral spectrum, however. Very recently Berthelot succeeded in
condensing the new gas argon with benzine vapor, and obtained a
magnificent green-and-yellow fluorescence under the influence of a
gentle electrification. The spectrum was very much like that of the
aurora, and it is suggested that through some combination of argon in
the upper air under electrical influences an auroral appearance might
result. This brings us to the views which have been put forward by
Paulsen abroad and Bigelow at home. The former thinks that the aurora
may be a luminous electrification of the upper air, brought about by
the absorption of radiant energy of a certain character and alteration
of the wavelength. The auroral light, then, would be a kind of
fluorescence. Bigelow, independently of Paulsen, had suggested a
similar explanation. He regards the aurora as a phosphorescence due to
the transformation of vibrating energy by the air. In other words,
certain motions of the ether, which we have no way of recognizing, are
altered just enough to convert them into light.
Before leaving the question of the
origin of the
aurora, we should
mention that occasionally in the southern part of the United States
feeble sporadic displays are seen. These are now known to occur at
times of great thunder-storm activity.
We have been called "children of the
sun," and there
is truth as well
as poetry in the designation. Year by year the man of science drags
himself a little closer to the great central engine. When Faraday, in
his mind's eye, saw lines of force traversing space, and when his great
disciple Maxwell bequeathed to us the electromagnetic theory of light,
men of science felt that a path had been staked out across the maze of
solar mysteries. The sun no longer shone as a giver of heat and light
only, for in the ether were nerve-like waves of every description.
Children of the sun, we respond not only to the great periodic changes,
but to every passing spasm and disturbance. Auroras are associated with
solar change. In studying them we may fathom the secrets of the sun.l
1
Astrophysicists
look forward with interest to the opening
of the new
Yerkes Observatory of the University of Chicago. Already, at the
Kenwood Observatory Professor Hale has photographed certain solar
disturbances, attempting to identify them with magnetic disturbances.
"It is yet premature," he says, "to draw conclusions; but the magnetic
disturbances seem to synchronize closely with spot activity."
Alexander
McAdie.
From:
"What Is An Aurora," by Alexander
McAdie, The Century
Magazine, Vol. 54, No. 6, Oct
1897, The Century Company, New York, pages 874-878. (source)
See
also:
- Other articles
on meterology written by Alexander McAdie.